ADU BONUS vs CCHS

Heather Medina, Principal Architect and Owner of ArchiDev Studio, professional headshot
Heather Medina
Jan 15, 2026
12
ADU Bonus Program: Where It Makes Sense

ADU Bonus vs. Complete Communities Housing Solutions: How We Decide Which Path Makes Sense

We often help clients decide between the ADU Bonus Program and Complete Communities Housing Solutions depending on site constraints, risk tolerance, and timeline. Below is the high-level comparison we use internally.

In San Diego, two of the most powerful density tools available to property owners and developers are the ADU Bonus Program and Complete Communities Housing Solutions (CCHS). While both programs can unlock additional units, they operate very differently—and those differences materially affect feasibility, approvals, parking, affordability, and long-term project risk.

At ArchiDev Studio, we don’t treat these programs as interchangeable. We use them strategically, based on how a site actually performs under real-world constraints.

Below is a high-level comparison we use internally when advising clients.

ADU Bonus Program
  • Residential zones only
  • ~40–45% market-rate / 55–60% deed-restricted mix
  • Unlimited density only in SDAs
  • 15-year deed restriction (~110% AMI)
  • Base zone FAR and height limits apply
  • Reduced rear/interior setbacks only
  • No waivers or incentives
  • No expedited review (unless paid)
  • 1 parking space/unit outside TPA
Complete Communities (CCHS)
  • Most zones citywide (excl. single-family)
  • 40% of pre-bonus units affordable (min 10%)
  • Unlimited density citywide
  • 55-year deed restriction
  • Tier-based bonus FAR (not base zoning)
  • No maximum height limit (subject to overlays)
  • By-right waivers available
  • Accelerated review (~30 days possible)
  • Reduced or eliminated parking

ADU Bonus Program: Where It Makes Sense

The ADU Bonus Program is often best suited for smaller residential lots and owners prioritizing a simpler entitlement pathway.

Key characteristics:

Important Update: Parking Requirements

Recent policy changes now require one (1) parking space per unit for ADU Bonus projects located outside a Transit Priority Area (TPA). This has become a critical feasibility issue on constrained lots, where parking can quickly erode buildable area and reduce achievable unit yield.

Bottom line: ADU Bonus remains a strong tool for certain infill sites, but base-zone limits and parking constraints now carry much more weight than they did previously.

Complete Communities Housing Solutions (CCHS): Where It Wins

CCHS is generally better suited for larger or more complex projects where flexibility and by-right relief outweigh longer affordability commitments.

Key characteristics:

Bottom line: CCHS offers far greater flexibility for yield, height, and parking, making it the preferred path for many multifamily and mixed-use projects—even with longer affordability terms and NEF costs.

How We Actually Decide Between ADU Bonus and CCHS

We don’t start with unit count. We start with risk.

When evaluating a site, we look at:

Physical Constraints
Lot size, shape, parking feasibility, and overlay zone requirements
Risk Tolerance
By-right certainty vs. discretionary exposure
Timeline Sensitivity
Speed to permit vs. speed to stabilization
Capital Strategy
Short-term hold vs. long-term asset positioning
Operational Complexity
ADA compliance, construction type, and coordination burden

In many cases, one program eliminates itself quickly once these factors are evaluated honestly.

FAQ: ADU Bonus vs. CCHS in San Diego

What is the difference between ADU Bonus and CCHS?

The ADU Bonus Program is limited to residential zones and constrained by base zoning, while CCHS applies citywide (with exceptions) and offers greater FAR, height, and parking flexibility.

Does the ADU Bonus Program require parking?

Yes. Projects located outside a Transit Priority Area must now provide one parking space per unit, which can significantly impact feasibility.

Which program is better for larger multifamily projects?

In most cases, CCHS is better suited for larger or more complex projects due to by-right waivers, reduced parking, and tier-based FAR bonuses.

Final Thought

Both programs are powerful—when applied intentionally. The wrong program on the wrong site can quietly erode yield, delay approvals, or introduce unnecessary risk.

If you’re evaluating a site and weighing these options, the conversation should start with strategy, not just code sections.